Today we are going to revisit sonnets and read some sonnets in class and then discuss PART III of "The Waste Land". Your homework is to take one of the sonnets we read in class, mark it up, and be able to present - in vast detail, as in a lecture - to class tomorrow (also, I realize that this makes you nervous, but no "I don't get this" - it's a cop out, discuss the poem).
Tomorrow, we will also continue with the discuss of part 3 of "The Waste Land".

The title is suppose to be a reference to Buddha.
There are a lot of links in this section to previous sections. See if you can find them.
Allusions:
To His Coy Mistress (we read yesterday - find)
TIRESIAS - appears in both Oedipus Rex and The Odyssey. He can see the future. Relate him to the fortune teller in section 1.
Tempest - remember there is a ship wreck in the Tempest.
St. Augustine.
WWI
There
are also songs in this section and the nightingale chirps with the
reinforcement of rape (which is one way of looking at the relationship
seen by Tiresias)
NOTES:
Mrs. Porter ran a brothel in
Cairo and was well known to Aussie troops (important because Gallipoli
was where Eliot lost a good friend).
Smyrna = Izmir (an ancient town in Turkey)
Elizabeth
I and Earl of Leicester were thought to have an affair (even through
Elizabeth had to deny it because she was suppose to be a virgin and
reserve herself for royalty of other nations)
The City (LONDON) in this section is a dump - made so in part by a coal plant.
The Fire Sermon
(Aditta-pariyaya-sutta)
Thus
I heard. On one occasion the Blessed One was living at Gaya, at
Gayasisa, together with a thousand bhikkhus. There he addressed the
bhikkhus.
"Bhikkhus, all is burning. And what is the all that is burning?
"The
eye is burning, forms are burning, eye-consciousness is burning,
eye-contact is burning, also whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or
neither-painful-nor-pleasant that arises with eye-contact for its
indispensable condition, that too is burning. Burning with what? Burning
with the fire of lust, with the fire of hate, with the fire of
delusion. I say it is burning with birth, aging and death, with sorrows,
with lamentations, with pains, with griefs, with despairs.
"The ear is burning, sounds are burning...
"The nose is burning, odors are burning...
"The tongue is burning, flavors are burning...
"The body is burning, tangibles are burning...
"The
mind is burning, ideas are burning, mind-consciousness is burning,
mind-contact is burning, also whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or
neither-painful-nor-pleasant that arises with mind-contact for its
indispensable condition, that too is burning. Burning with what? Burning
with the fire of lust, with the fire of hate, with the fire of
delusion. I say it is burning with birth, aging and death, with sorrows,
with lamentations, with pains, with griefs, with despairs.
"Bhikkhus,
when a noble follower who has heard (the truth) sees thus, he finds
estrangement in the eye, finds estrangement in forms, finds estrangement
in eye-consciousness, finds estrangement in eye-contact, and whatever
is felt as pleasant or painful or neither-painful- nor-pleasant that
arises with eye-contact for its indispensable condition, in that too he
finds estrangement.
"He finds estrangement in the ear... in sounds...
"He finds estrangement in the nose... in odors...
"He finds estrangement in the tongue... in flavors...
"He finds estrangement in the body... in tangibles...
"He
finds estrangement in the mind, finds estrangement in ideas, finds
estrangement in mind-consciousness, finds estrangement in mind-contact,
and whatever is felt as pleasant or painful or
neither-painful-nor-pleasant that arises with mind-contact for its
indispensable condition, in that too he finds estrangement.
"When
he finds estrangement, passion fades out. With the fading of passion,
he is liberated. When liberated, there is knowledge that he is
liberated. He understands: 'Birth is exhausted, the holy life has been
lived out, what can be done is done, of this there is no more beyond.'"
That is what the Blessed One said. The bhikkhus were glad, and they approved his words.
Now during his utterance, the hearts of those thousand bhikkhus were liberated from taints through clinging no more.

Go here for a radio program on the Fisher King
Here is a link to an essay on the Fisher King in "The Waste Land".
The following is from the University of Idaho student research project on the Fisher King:
THE WASTE LAND: The concept of physical sterility carrying over into
other spheres of life was an appealing objective correlative for poets
in the wake of the first World War (used most effectively by T.S. Eliot
to symbolize social and moral decay). But the intimate relationship
existing between a monarch and his provinces probably relates back to a
pagan strand from much earlier times. The waste land ultimately springs
from an old Celtic belief in which the fertility of the land depended on
the potency and virility of the king; the king was in essence espoused
to his lands. In his comprehensive study, The Golden Bough, J. G. Fraser
identifies a similar ritual in various cultures the world round. "The
king's life or spirit is so sympathetically bound up with the prosperity
of the whole country," he writes, "that if he fell ill or grew senile
the cattle would sicken or cease to multiply, the crops would rot in the
fields, and men would perish of widespread disease." Such is the case
in the Grail legends as well. The woes of the land are the direct result
of the sickness or the maiming of the Fisher King. When his power
wanes, the country is laid waste and the soil is rendered sterile: the
trees are without fruit, the crops fail to grow, even the women are
unable to bear children. To suggest that the waste land functions at the
very heart of the problem seems a gross understatement indeed. Once
again, Weston takes the matter one step further: "In the Grail King we
have a romantic literary version of that strange mysterious figure whose
presence hovers in the shadowy background of the history of our Aryan
race; the figure of a divine or semidivine ruler, at once god and king,
upon whose life, and unimpaired vitality, the existence of his land and
people directly depends."
In the case of the waste land the
solution assumes the form of the questing Grail Knight. He is the one
who must ask the loaded question that restores fertility to king and
land alike. However, as Cavendish notes, the healing of the Fisher King
and his lands is never satisfactorily resolved in the medieval romances
that have been handed down:
The tradition of the king as the mate
of his land lies behind the Waste Land theme in the Grail legends, but
the theme in incoherent and amorphous. The pattern ought to be this: a
king is crippled or ill; as a result his land is barren; the hero heal s
the king and fertility is restored to the land; probably, the hero's
feat shows that he is the rightful heir. There is no Grail story in
which this simple and satisfactory pattern appears (nor has any Celtic
story survived which contains it). In the First Continuation there is a
waste land which is restored, but no crippled or ill king and
consequently no healing. In Parzival there is a crippled king who is
healed by the hero, but there is no waste land. In Perlesvaus there is
an ill king and a waste land, but no healing.
No comments:
Post a Comment